Showing posts with label ca updates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ca updates. Show all posts

Saturday, 26 September 2015

AUDITORS SHOULD NOT AFFIX THEIR DIGITAL SIGNATURE IN ROC RETURNS




Forms for annual filing have been released today. The two forms ie Form 23AC and ACA have been replaced by a single Form AOC-4.


Now every company needs to file its balance sheet in Form AOC-4

Form AOC -4 is required to be certified by any CA CS or ICWA in practice by subscribing to the declaration that the respective professional has been duly engaged for certification of the said form.

As per the provisions of section 144 of the Companies Act 2013 certain services can't be rendered as an auditor, which includes “management services”

Management services means services rendered on behalf of Management, which management itself is oblige to do.
E.g.

Preparation and filling of:
· Income Tax Return
· ROC Return
· Service Tax Return
· VAT Return
· TDS Return
· Excise Return

This can be planned to comply with the provision.

- CA Kasliwal Ambar

Friday, 25 September 2015

CASA Daily News Alert

>> TAR/ITR Extension Case:

Writ Petition filed against non extension of Due date of TAR/ITR filing for cases covered under Tax Audit Provisions in various High Courts (Gujarat, Delhi, Jodhpur, Karnataka, Orrisa, Mumbai and in Punjab & Haryana) - Cases adjourned for Hearing / Cases Listed for Final Hearing later. ICAI Meeting with FM: No Concrete Decision on TAR/ITR Date Extension.

>> CBDT has updated the tax audit utility today by updating utilities for form 3CA CD, form 3CB CD and form 10B. So please take care and in case you are using tax filling software ask your vendor to update software.

>> ICAI: Exposure Draft of Changes in Ind ASs as a consequence of deferment of Ind AS 115, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, for Public Comments issued

>> MCA Updates: New forms (AOC-4, MGT-7, ADT-2, SH-9) will be available from 25-09-2015. Versions of CRA-4 & CHG-4 are likely to be modified w.e.f. 25-09-2015.

>> SEBI has issued circular under Regulation 27(2) of the SEBI(Listing obligations and disclosure requirements) Regulations, 2015 read with regulation 101(2) (Clause 49 of the existing listing agreement), which provides for the format for compliance report on corporate governance to be submitted to the Stock exchanges by the listed entities.

>> Case Study: Bombay High Court held In the case of M/s Nagpur Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT. that in order to attract ceiling u/s 40(c), the payment must be a periodical payment. A Lumsum payment or one time payment is not covered under section 40(c) of Income Tax Act

- CA Kasliwal Ambar


Saturday, 19 September 2015

Cash loan of above Rs. 20,000 taken by builder to meet immediate requirement of business won’t attract penalty












Section 269SS, read with sections 273B and 271D, of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Deposits - Mode of taking/accepting


Penalty under section 271D could not be levied when assessee sufficiently process that loan was taken in excess of Rs. 20,000 to meet urgent and immediate requirement of Business

[2015] 56 taxmann.com 439 -HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT –CIT v. Shreenathji Corpn

Assessee carries on business of construction of building and in course of such business large amount of labour charges and payments for raw material purchased from unorganized trading sectors and bricks etc. are required to be made after banking hours

If their demand for cash payment was not met they would cancel contract work and refused to complete work and would also prevent other contractors from undertaking work till their dues were settled

It was held that since loan/deposits was taken in excess of Rs. 20,000 to meet urgent and immediate requirements of business, no penalty could be imposed

Circulars and Notifications: Circular Nos. 387 dated 6-7-1984 and 572, dated 3-8-1990


- CA Kasliwal Ambar

Thursday, 17 September 2015

Chartered Accountant: Latest Updates You Need To Know - 17th September 2015


1. President ICAI suggested Finance Minister to extend due date of filing of ITR & Tax Audit Report be extended from 30.9.2015 to atleast 31.10.2015 for genuine hardship to the assesses and members of the profession.

2. Individuals can now apply for PAN online with digital signature w.e.f 6.9.2015.

3. Salary and Interest to partner to be allowed as deduction while estimating the profits of the firm where books of accounts are rejected- Inter Continental Constructions (High Court of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana).

4. If the notice u/s 148 of I T Act was not served on the assessee in accordance with law, the re-assessment made is liable to be quashed.[ CIT vs. Chetan Gupta, High Court of Delhi]

5. Now a private company can accept unsecured loans also from a relative of director, with a declaration that such loan is not from borrowings. Notification dated 15.09.2015.

6. Union Cabinet has approved to promulgate the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Ordinance 2015 which redefined the jurisdiction clause in the Negotiable Instrument Act.

7. DGFT has notified modification in E-IEC’s as well as the IEC’s issued in physical format from 21st of September, 2015. www.dgft.nic.in.

- CA Kasliwal Ambar

Wednesday, 16 September 2015

‪MCA‬ Update on Deposit From Relative By ‪Private Limited Company‬

Deposits rules are quickly getting aligned with old 58A exempted rules to private limited company.
Without any upper limit of amount, now a private company can accept unsecured loans apart from director even from a relative (as per definition) of a director of the company with simple declaration saying the relative has not borrowed same from others. The relative need not be a shareholder of the company.

Saturday, 5 September 2015

Abolition of ISA Eligibility Test



The Committee decided to abolish the ISA Eligibility Test from the Post Qualification Course on Information Systems Audit and all the members who have not yet qualified the ISA Eligibility Test and completed the Professional Training classes will be allowed to appear directly in the forthcoming ISA Assessment Test scheduled to be held in December, 2015. All the participants who will complete their professional training classes by 20th November, 2015 will be allowed to appear directly in the ISA Assessment Test scheduled to be held in the month of December, 2015.

- CA Kasliwal Ambar

Monday, 24 August 2015

Service Tax on Home Delivery of Food not applicable




As per Govt norms, Service Tax is levied if the Food is served in an Air Conditioned Restaurant.

However, there has been a lot of confusion regarding levy of Service Tax on Home Delivery of Food as such food is not being eaten in a AC Restaurant.

A clarification in this regard was sought from the office of the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax Division (Chandigarh) in this regard.

It has in a written communication replied that in the case of Transaction involving Pick-up/ Home Delivery of food sold by a Restaurant, the dominant nature of the transaction is that of Sale and not service as the Food is not served at the Restaurant.
Moreover, no element of service is being offered at the Restaurant, be it ambience, live entertainment, air conditioning, personal hospitality etc. The Service Tax can only be levied if there is an element of "Service" involved which would typically be the case where the food is served in a Restaurant.

Therefore, the above transaction is not chargeable to Service Tax, being sale in nature, only if, no amount is charged for such free delivery of food.

- CA Kasliwal Ambar

Sunday, 23 August 2015

IMPORTANT UPDATES FOR CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS - 24 Aug 2015

➡ IMPORTANTS NEWS

1. Govt. enables online filing of form FC-TRS for transfer of shares between NRs and Residents via e-Biz portal

➡ INCOME TAX

1. Even if advance forfeited by supplier wasn't allowable as bad-debt, yet it could be considered as business loss. 60 taxmann.com 82 (Guwahati - Trib.)

2. 60 taxmann.com 206 (Bombay)Where assessee- joint venture company did not execute contract work on its own and same was done by one of its constituents, as there was no finding of receipt of any income by assessee on account of said contract, same would not be taxable in its hands.

➡ BANKING AND CORPORATES LAWS
1. SEBI proposes to allow Infra Investment Trusts to invest in two level SPVs and to reduce sponsor's commitment.

➡ CST AND VAT LAWS
1. August 22, 2015[2015] 60 taxmann.com 191 (Karnataka) CST & VAT: Karnataka VAT - Only condition for making further reassessment under section 39(2) in addition to earlier reassessment is when authority takes notice of further evidence

2. The purchaser need not to reversed input tax credit unless seller has claimed refund in case of incentive given or credit note issued ruled by Delhi high Court.

➡ SERVICE TAX AND EXCISE LAWS.
1. Service Tax could not be levied to indivisible works contract prior to 1-6-2007.

2. 59 taxmann.com 460 (Bombay) Excise & Customs : Tribunal does not have power to dismiss appeal for default or for want of prosecution, without adjudication on merits; and if appeal has been so dismissed, Tribunal must restore same subject to reasonable conditions.

- CA Kasliwal Ambar


Saturday, 22 August 2015

Important Announcement for Final Course Students - November 2015 Examinations



Subject: Revised Reading Material on the Insurance Act, 1938 incorporating Insurance Laws (Amendment) Act, 2015 - Relevant for the Final Examination to be held in November 2015.
Students are quite aware that for the purpose of Examination a cut off period of six months would be applicable in case of any legislative amendment(s) in the relevant subject(s) for the purpose of applicability to the relevant examination. In this connection, we wish to inform to inform you that the Insurance Laws (Amendment) Act, 2015 an act further to amend the Insurance Act, 1938 will be applicable for the November, 2015 examination. This Amendment Act is deemed to have come into force on 26th December, 2014 though it was passed by the Lok Sabha on 4th March, 2015, by the Rajya Sabha on 12th March, 2015 and receiving the assent of the President on 20thMarch, 2015.The Amendment Act, 2015 paved the way for major reforms in the Insurance Act, 1938, the General Insurance Business (Nationalization) Act, 1972 and the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) Act, 1999.

Keeping in view of the applicability for the November, 2015 (Final Examinations), the Board of Studies has revised the existing reading material in the relevant Chapter 23 of Module 2 of Paper 4 (Corporate and Allied Laws) for the Final Course. Students appearing for the November, 2015 Final examinations may kindly download the said revised reading material from the BOS (Knowledge Portal) straightway without waiting for the publication of the revised reading material which is likely to be published only in January, 2016. This will enable them to facilitate reading and understanding of the latest amendments in the existing Insurance Act, 1938 keeping in view the forthcoming November, 2015 Final Examination. Accordingly, the existing material on the Insurance Act, 1938 in the study Module No. 2 stands withdrawn and revised material on this Chapter would be applicable for the November, 2015 examination.

Rtp for Nov'15 attempt is hosted in institute website.

-CA Kasliwal Ambar

Rule-21A, Income-tax Rules




Rule-21A, Income-tax Rules

30[Relief when salary is paid in arrears or in advance, etc.

21A. 31[(1) Where, by reason of any portion of an assessee's salary being paid in arrears or in advance or, by reason of any portion of family pension received by an assessee being paid in arrears or, by reason of his having received in any one financial year salary for more than twelve months or a payment which under the provisions of clause (3) of section 17 is a profit in lieu of salary, his income is assessed at a rate higher than that at which it would otherwise have been assessed, the relief to be granted under sub-section (1) of section 89 shall be—

(a) where any portion of the assessee's salary is received in arrears or in advance or, any portion of family pension is received by an assessee in arrears, in accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (2);(b) where the payment is in the nature of gratuity in respect of past services of the assessee extending over a period of not less than five years, in accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (3);(c) where the payment is in the nature of compensation received by the assessee from his employer or former employer at or in connection with the termination of his employment after continuous service for not less than three years and where the unexpired portion of his term of employment is also not less than three years, in accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (4);(d) where the payment is in commutation of pension, in accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (5); and(e) where the payment is not in the nature of salary paid in arrears or in advance or gratuity in respect of past services or compensation received at or in connection with the termination of employment or in commutation of pension, in accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (6).

(2)(a) In a case referred to in clause (a) of sub-rule (1), the tax payable by the assessee on his total income of the previous year in which the salary is received in arrears or in advance or, in which the family pension is received in arrears (such salary or family pension being hereafter in this sub-rule referred to respectively as the additional salary or additional family pension, as the case may be, and such previous year being hereafter in this sub-rule referred to as the relevant previous year) shall be reduced by theamount, if any, by which the tax on the additional salary or additional family pension, calculated in the manner specified in clause (b), exceeds the tax or the aggregate tax on the additional salary or additional family pension, calculated in the manner specified in clause (c) or clause (d), as the case may be.

(b) Tax shall be calculated on the total income of the relevant previous year as reduced by the additional salary or additional family pension, as the case may be, as if the total income so reduced were the total income of the assessee, and the amount by which the tax so calculated falls short of the tax on the total income before such reduction shall, for the purposes of clause (a), be taken to be the tax on the additional salary or additional family pension, under this clause.

(c) Where the additional salary or additional family pension, as the case may be, relates to only one previous year, tax shall be calculated on the total income of the said previous year as increased by the additional salary or additional family pension, as if the total income so increased were the total income of the assessee, and the amountby which the tax so calculated exceeds the tax payable by the assessee in respect of the total income of the said previous year shall, for the purposes of clause (a), be taken to be the tax on the additional salary or additional family pension, under this clause.

(d) Where the additional salary or additional family pension, as the case may be, relates to more than one previous year,—

(i) the previous years to which the additional salary or additional family pension relates and the amount relating to each such previous year shall first be ascertained;(ii) tax shall, then, be calculated on the total income of each such previous year as increased by the amount relating to such previous year ascertained under sub-clause (i); as if the total income so increased were the total income of that previous year, and the amount by which the aggregate amount of tax in respect of the aforesaid previous years as calculated under sub-clause (ii) exceeds the aggregate amount of tax payable by the assessee in respect of the total income of the said previous years shall, for the purposes of clause (a), be taken to be the aggregate tax on the additional salary or additional family pension, under this clause.]

(3) (a) In a case referred to in clause (b) of sub-rule (1), the tax payable by the assessee on his total income of the previous year in which the payment by way of gratuity is received (such previous year being hereafter in this sub-rule referred to as the relevant previous year) shall be reduced by theamount, if any, by which the tax on theamount of the gratuity included in the total income of the relevant previous year, calculated at the average rate of tax applicable to such total income, exceeds the tax on the amount of such gratuity, calculated at the rate of tax determined under clause (b) or, as the case may be, clause (c).

(b) Where the payment by way of gratuity is made in respect of past services of the assessee extending over a period of not less than five years but less than fifteen years,—

(i) the total income of the assessee in respect of each of the two previous years immediately preceding the relevant previous year shall be increased by an amount equal to one-half of the amount of the gratuity included in the total income of the relevant previous year, and the average rate of tax for each of the said two previous years shall be calculated as if the total income so increased were the total income of that previous year; and(ii) the average of the average rates of tax for the two previous years immediately preceding the relevant previous year, calculated in accordance with sub-clause (i), shall, for the purposes of clause (a), be the rate of tax determined under this clause.

(c) Where the payment by way of gratuity is made in respect of past services of the assessee extending over a period of not less than fifteen years,—

(i) the total income of the assessee in respect of each of the three previous years immediately preceding the relevant previous year shall be increased by an amount equal to one-third of the amount of the gratuity included in the total income of the relevant previous year, and the average rate of tax for each of the said three previous years shall be calculated as if the total income so increased were the total income of that previous year; and(ii) the average of the average rates of tax for the three previous years immediately preceding the relevant previous year, calculated in accordance with sub-clause (i), shall, for the purposes of clause (a), be the rate of tax determined under this clause.

(4) (a) In a case referred to in clause (c) of sub-rule (1), the tax payable by the assessee on his total income of the previous year in which the payment by way of compensation is received (such previous year being hereafter in this sub-rule referred to as the relevant previous year) shall be reduced by theamount, if any, by which the tax on theamount of the compensation included in the total income of the relevant previous year, calculated at the average rate of tax applicable to such total income, exceeds the tax on the amountof such compensation, calculated at the rate of tax determined under clause (b).

(b) The total income of the assessee in respect of each of the three previous years immediately preceding the relevant previous year shall be increased by an amount equal to one-third of the amount.

- CA Kasliwal Ambar

SEBI imposed a penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs on the Director of Manappuram Finance Limited for breach of SEBI Regulations.


SEBI vide its order dated August 19, 2015 imposed a penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs on the Director of Manappuram Finance Limited for breach of SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations. The brief facts of the case are as follows :

1. The wife of the Directors sold shares of the Company without seeking pre-clearance from the Compliance Officer.

2. The Director submitted that (i) his wife was financially independent (ii) trading without pre-clearance was only a technically slip that would not warrant any penalty - an opinion from Amarchand Mangaldas was also submitted to support these views. (iii) he had discussed at the board meeting of the Company about the intention of his wife to sell the shares of the Company.

3. SEBI observed and ruled that (i) financial independence is immaterial in case of spouse (ii) trading without pre-clearance is a violation of regulation and hence penalty would follow (iii) the discussion of the wife proposed trade at the board meeting is not substantiated with agenda or minutes of the meeting and (iv) penalized the Director for violation of Regulations and Internal code of conduct.

Key Take-away – Personal Transaction Policy and SEBI Insider Trading norms need to be followed in letter and spirit. SEBI does not take into account any technicalities or intention of the parties. You may note that the Director in this case was about 90 years old retired civil servant without any blemish but still had been penalized for the unintentional error.

Friday, 21 August 2015

Daily CA Updates - 21st August 2015


PROFESSIONAL UPDATES:
21st August, 2015


► Govt. has notified challan no ITNS 284 for depositing taxes under the black money Act.

► ITR E-Verification is possible through

i. authenticate your Aadhaar and link it with your PAN,

ii. Net-banking account and get redirected to the efiling,

iii. E-filing OTP (available only if the Returned Income is below Rs 5 Lakh and no refund is claimed).

► With effect from 1st SEP'15, all 2nd & 4th Saturdays, declared as Public Holiday for all Banks and 1st and 3rd Saturday full working days.
► FAST TRACK EXIT (FTE) FOR DEFUNCT COMPANIES U/s Sec 248 of 2013 Act if The Co have “Nil” Assets & Liabilities and not carrying any business activity except Listed Companies by application Form FTE with fees of Rs. 5,000/-.
► CBEC clarifies on Show Cause Notice issuance & proceedings conclusion as per amended penal provisions in Service Tax and Central Excise.
► Supreme Court on 20th Aug 2015 in the case of CCE Kerala vs Larsen & Toubro Ltd. held that Service Tax can not be levied on indivisible contracts prior to the introduction on 1st June 2007 which expressly makes such works contracts liable to service tax.

- CA Kasliwal Ambar

Thursday, 20 August 2015

IMPORTANT NEWS & UPDATES FOR CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS - 20th Aug 2015


IMPORTANTS NEWS

1. Govt. notifies 'Challan No. ITNS 284' for depositing taxes under Black Money Act.
2. RBI grants approvals for 11 payment banks including Reliance, Airtel, Vodafone

INCOME TAX

1. Compounding fee paid to Municipal Corporation is in nature of penalty disallowable.

2. 60 taxmann.com 287 (Chennai - Trib.) ITAT allows sec. 11 tax exemption to Tamil Nadu Cricket Association.

3. High Court has inherent power to review its own judgment, says Supreme Court.

4. 60 taxmann.com 135 (Bombay) No concealment penalty if sum treated as capital receipt was disclosed in notes to accounts and return.

BANKING AND CORPORATES LAWS
1. 60 taxmann.com 285 (SAT - Mumbai) Where in guise of running real estate business, PACL was running sham Collective Investment Schemes (CIS) which were detrimental to interest of investors, decision of SEBI directing PACL to wind up existing CIS and refund money collected from investors with promised return could not faulted.

CST AND VAT LAWS
1. 60 taxmann.com 123 (Gujarat) Gujarat VAT - Where Assessing Authority cancelled registration certificates of assessee on ground that alleged purchases made by it from two dealers were bogus and not genuine and even assessee had indulged into billing activities only, registration certificates had been rightly cancelled.

SERVICE TAX AND EXCISE LAWS.
1. 60 taxmann.com 122 (SC): Wharfage charges and lease rent recovered by port authorities cannot be regarded as 'service' in relation to 'a vessel or goods' and cannot be said to be a service provided by 'port or person authorised by it'; hence, same is not liable to service tax under port services.

2. Excise :No personal penalty on directors where issue relates to interpretation of law and situation is revenue neutral.

- CA Kasliwal Ambar

Your purchase on a foreign website can attract the taxman.


Domestic I-T laws require you to deduct tax on software, e-books and music albums; must report every such transactions while filing returns.

You pay Rs 250 to purchase your favourite artist's album from his or her website and save it on your device. According to new taxation laws, you will need to deduct a withholding tax on it. The amount that needs to be deducted is in itself a complex computation. The person will need to refer to the procedure mentioned in the Income Tax Act (chapter XVIIB) or 20 per cent of the amount paid, whichever is higher. To calculate the liability, you will also need to consider if India has any taxation agreement with the country called as Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.

To complicate the matters further, the new rules also require individuals as well as businesses to report every transaction they make with a non-resident person or entity. This means, if you purchase from Apple App Store, iTunes, Amazon’s global websites, or on eBay Global EasyBuy, you will need to tell the tax authority on each and every transaction done, irrespective of the amount, while filing your returns. And if you don't follow the laid down procedures, the assessing officer can slap a penalty of Rs 1 lakh for non-compliance.

If you are wondering how to determine if the payment was made directly to the company abroad or if it was routed through the Indian entity, tax experts say the person should refer to their bank and credit card statements. These clearly show if the transaction was domestic or international.

The amendment is part of the section 195(6) of the Income Tax Act. Vishweshwar Mudigonda, partner, Deloitte Haskins & Sells, said while the section was changed, the rule (37BB), which covers the specifics of the section is still old and so are the forms (15 CA and 15CB) in which details need to be filled up. Earlier, individuals and businesses were only required to report if the single transaction was above Rs 50,000 or payment to one person/entity crosses Rs 2.5 lakh a year.

“This has created a lot of confusion. Even if some decides to follow the law, he or she can’t do it as there are no provisions made of it,” says Mudigonda. He added thankfully the government has not tinkered with the exempted transactions in the last Budget. Any payments made for medical emergencies, donations, gifts, business-related travel, and so on remain exempted.

While tax experts called the amendments ‘impractical’ and illogical’, all of them said they were hoping that the Central Board of Direct Taxation will clarity the issue because even if someone decides to follow the law, he or she might not be able to do it unless the government brings about changes to the rule and forms. Their advice to taxpayers: wait and watch.

- CA Kasliwal Ambar

Tuesday, 18 August 2015

Daily CA Updates - Wednesday - August 19

IMPORTANTS NEWS 


1. Last date for filing Dvat return for Q1 again extended to August 25,2015

➡INCOME TAX


1. CBDT notifies rules to determine period of stay of crew members of foreign bound ships in India. notification no 70/2015 dt Aug 17
2. 60 taxmann.com 246 (Uttarakhand).The amount of interest received on the refund of Income Tax is not includible in the amount on which the assessee is liable taxed under Section 44BB of the Act. B J SERVICES COMPANY vs ACIT
3. 60 taxmann.com 55 (Bombay) Where motive of assessee is not generation of profit but to provide training to needy women in order to equip or train them and make them self-confident and self-reliant and occasional sales or trust's own fund generation was for furthering objects of trust, proviso to section 2(15) would not apply.

Dit vs women's India trust

➡ BANKING AND CORPORATES LAWS

1. Investment by Category I and II AIFs in shares of start-ups shall be deemed to be investment in unlisted shares.
2. Takeover code not applicable to startups that are listed without making a public issue.
3. Delisting norms not applicable to securities listed by start-ups without making a public issue

➡CST AND VAT LAWS

1. Govt. tweaks Rules relating to reduction of tax credit under Delhi VAT in case sale at discount or incentive through credit note is recd . Notification dt Aug 12 no 650.
2. Officer-in-charge has no power to seize goods-in-transit with valid documents.Reckitt Benckiser india ltd vs state of tripura.

➡ SERVICE TAX AND EXCISE LAWS.

1. Delhi High Court asks dept. to respond to challenge made against amended provisions of Service Tax Audit in section 94(2)(k)and rule 5A(2). Mega cabs p ltd vs union of india.
2. Cement/steel used in construction of storage facility is eligible for Cenvat credit. Grasim Industries Ltd Vs Comm Excise Jaipur

- CA Kasliwal Ambar
Birla Corp to acquire Jojobera and Sonadih cement businesses from Lafarge 






 Birla Corp will acquire the Acquisition Business, which comprises of an integrated cement unit at Sonadih (Chhattisgarh), a cement grinding unit at Jojobera Qharkhand), along with Concreto and PSC brands and an excellent management team.



Birla Corporation Limited (Birla Corp) today announced that it has agreed to a  transaction with Lafarge India Private Limited (Lafarge India), whereby Birla  Corp, either directly or through its wholly owned subsidiary, shall acquire both the Jojobera and Sonadih cement businesses (Acquisition Business) from Lafarge India for an Enterprise Value of Rs. 5,000 crores. The transaction would be funded through existing cash reserves and incremental debt, and is subject to approval of Competition Commission of India and other relevant regulatory approvals .














Under this transaction, Birla Corp will acquire the Acquisition Business, which comprises of  an integrated cement unit at Sonadih (Chhattisgarh), a cement grinding  unit  at Jojobera  Qharkhand), along with Concreto and PSC brands and an excellent management team. Acquisition Business has a cement capacity of -5.15 million tonnes per annum (mtpa), with mineral rights over  adequate reserves of limestone. The Acquisition Business has a demonstrated track record of operational and commercial excellence with profitability amongst the highest in the industry aided by raw material linkages, strong distribution networks and excellent brand loyalty in the attractive Eastern  India cement market. Upon completion of this transaction, Birla Corp will consolidate its position in the Eastern India cement market where demand supply scenario and outlook con.tinue to remain buoyant.

Birla Corp, established in 1919, is part of the MP Birla Group with presence across cement and jute; cement constitutes over 90% of the company's revenues with a total operational cement capacity of -10 mtpa, it has units in Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal. Post completion of this transaction, Birla Corp will have a total capacity of -15 mtpa. With addition of these brands to its existing basket of brands, Birla Corp will derive synergy benefits through consolidation of its capacity.

Harsh Lodha, Chairman of Birla Corp, said: "I am very pleased to announce this very important transaction in Birla Carp's history. The Acquisition Business together with the Concreto and PSC brands, perfectly fit into our strategic vision and ambition of enhancing our competitiveness in our chosen markets. I am glad to welcome new talent and leaders to our Group, who share our convictions and professional culture".

KRISCORE Financial Advisors and SBI Capital Markets Limited were financial advisors and Nishith Desai Associates acted as counsel to Birla  Corp for this transaction.

- CA Kasliwal Ambar