Showing posts with label chartered accountant india. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chartered accountant india. Show all posts

Friday, 25 September 2015

CASA Daily News Alert

>> TAR/ITR Extension Case:

Writ Petition filed against non extension of Due date of TAR/ITR filing for cases covered under Tax Audit Provisions in various High Courts (Gujarat, Delhi, Jodhpur, Karnataka, Orrisa, Mumbai and in Punjab & Haryana) - Cases adjourned for Hearing / Cases Listed for Final Hearing later. ICAI Meeting with FM: No Concrete Decision on TAR/ITR Date Extension.

>> CBDT has updated the tax audit utility today by updating utilities for form 3CA CD, form 3CB CD and form 10B. So please take care and in case you are using tax filling software ask your vendor to update software.

>> ICAI: Exposure Draft of Changes in Ind ASs as a consequence of deferment of Ind AS 115, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, for Public Comments issued

>> MCA Updates: New forms (AOC-4, MGT-7, ADT-2, SH-9) will be available from 25-09-2015. Versions of CRA-4 & CHG-4 are likely to be modified w.e.f. 25-09-2015.

>> SEBI has issued circular under Regulation 27(2) of the SEBI(Listing obligations and disclosure requirements) Regulations, 2015 read with regulation 101(2) (Clause 49 of the existing listing agreement), which provides for the format for compliance report on corporate governance to be submitted to the Stock exchanges by the listed entities.

>> Case Study: Bombay High Court held In the case of M/s Nagpur Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT. that in order to attract ceiling u/s 40(c), the payment must be a periodical payment. A Lumsum payment or one time payment is not covered under section 40(c) of Income Tax Act

- CA Kasliwal Ambar


Thursday, 24 September 2015

Delhi High Court rejected writ for extention of due date for TAR

Delhi High Court rejected writ for extension of due date for TAR; said CAs should have completed audit by 7th July( i.e. date till form notified), time thereafter is sufficient to file TAR (7th July to 30th September) 

Facts:
a) The petitioner claims to be entitled to extension of due date of filing income-tax return (‘ITR’) (i.e., September 30, 2015) due to the delay on the part of the respondents in prescribing the ITR forms. b) It was contended that the said forms were prescribed only vide Notification dated 29th July, 2015 and were made available only with effect from August 7, 2015. The argument of the counsel for the petitioner was that since the Assessment Year 2015-2016 commenced on 1st April, 2015 and the due date for filing the return is 30th September, 2015, so 180 days are to be made available to the assessee to file the return. The Delhi High Court held as under:

1) The period claimed by the petitioner as a matter of right of 180 days for filing the ITR is admittedly not prescribed, neither in the Statute nor in the Rules.

2) Filing of ITR for assesses due date whereof is 180 day sis dependent upon the accounts of the assessee being audited and which audit the counsel for the petitioner admits commences only on the beginning of assessment year. The said audit, in the case of some assesses may be completed in a few days and in case of others may take longer. Thus, the time taken in audit, which is variable, will be determinative of the time available thereafter for filing the ITR. Said audit is not dependent upon the prescription of the income-tax return (‘ITR’)forms.

3) Once the audit is complete the time admittedly available from 29th July, 2015 / 7th August, 2015 to 30th September, 2015 cannot be said to be so small.

4) The Government vide Press Release dated 9th September, 2015 have already clarified that the date of 30th September, 2015 will not be extended and have advised the taxpayers to file the returns accordingly. The time available, after 7th August, 2015 and till 30th September, 2015 is not found to be illogical or unreasonable to enable the assessees to file the ITR.

5) The counsel for CBDT is unable to give the reasons for the forms are not available at the beginning of the assessment year on 1st April of every year and the same thereby causing inconvenience to the practitioners of the subject.

6) There is sufficient time available to the Government, after the Finance Act of the financial year, to finalise the forms and if no change is intended therein, to notify of the same immediately.

7) From the next assessment year Government should at least ensure that the forms which are to be prescribed for their Audit Report and for filing the ITR are available as on 1st April of the assessment year unless there is a valid reason therefore and which should be recorded in writing by the respondents themselves, without waiting for any representations to be made.

-CA Kasliwal Ambar

Saturday, 19 September 2015

Cash loan of above Rs. 20,000 taken by builder to meet immediate requirement of business won’t attract penalty












Section 269SS, read with sections 273B and 271D, of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Deposits - Mode of taking/accepting


Penalty under section 271D could not be levied when assessee sufficiently process that loan was taken in excess of Rs. 20,000 to meet urgent and immediate requirement of Business

[2015] 56 taxmann.com 439 -HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT –CIT v. Shreenathji Corpn

Assessee carries on business of construction of building and in course of such business large amount of labour charges and payments for raw material purchased from unorganized trading sectors and bricks etc. are required to be made after banking hours

If their demand for cash payment was not met they would cancel contract work and refused to complete work and would also prevent other contractors from undertaking work till their dues were settled

It was held that since loan/deposits was taken in excess of Rs. 20,000 to meet urgent and immediate requirements of business, no penalty could be imposed

Circulars and Notifications: Circular Nos. 387 dated 6-7-1984 and 572, dated 3-8-1990


- CA Kasliwal Ambar

Thursday, 17 September 2015

Chartered Accountant: Latest Updates You Need To Know - 17th September 2015


1. President ICAI suggested Finance Minister to extend due date of filing of ITR & Tax Audit Report be extended from 30.9.2015 to atleast 31.10.2015 for genuine hardship to the assesses and members of the profession.

2. Individuals can now apply for PAN online with digital signature w.e.f 6.9.2015.

3. Salary and Interest to partner to be allowed as deduction while estimating the profits of the firm where books of accounts are rejected- Inter Continental Constructions (High Court of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana).

4. If the notice u/s 148 of I T Act was not served on the assessee in accordance with law, the re-assessment made is liable to be quashed.[ CIT vs. Chetan Gupta, High Court of Delhi]

5. Now a private company can accept unsecured loans also from a relative of director, with a declaration that such loan is not from borrowings. Notification dated 15.09.2015.

6. Union Cabinet has approved to promulgate the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Ordinance 2015 which redefined the jurisdiction clause in the Negotiable Instrument Act.

7. DGFT has notified modification in E-IEC’s as well as the IEC’s issued in physical format from 21st of September, 2015. www.dgft.nic.in.

- CA Kasliwal Ambar

Wednesday, 16 September 2015

‪MCA‬ Update on Deposit From Relative By ‪Private Limited Company‬

Deposits rules are quickly getting aligned with old 58A exempted rules to private limited company.
Without any upper limit of amount, now a private company can accept unsecured loans apart from director even from a relative (as per definition) of a director of the company with simple declaration saying the relative has not borrowed same from others. The relative need not be a shareholder of the company.

Tuesday, 15 September 2015

Learn CARO, 2015 in just a minute.

Lets Begin!!

We have to learn one line to learn each point of CARO , 2015.

Line is:

"FIL ID Code - SAD GUN"

1. F : Fixed assets
2. I : Inventories

3. L : Loans u/s 189

4. I : internal control system

5. D : Deposited

6. Code : Cost records

7. S : Statutory dues

8. A : Accumulated Losses

9. D : Default of repayment

10. G : Guarantee for Loan

11. U : Usage of Term Loan

12. N : Noticed any fraud and its reporting ?

- CA Kasliwal Ambar

Wednesday, 9 September 2015

GST Update











Companies with an annual turnover up to Rs 25 lakh might be exempted from the proposed national goods and services tax (GST). The Centre and states are likely to settle for this threshold as they finalise the GST laws.

According to finance ministry officials, the draft of these laws is expected to be ready by the end of this month. The Centre and states are working on a mechanism to avoid dual scrutiny of companies by them. "The thinking now is that all legal entities with an annual turnover of up to Rs 25 lakh will be completely exempt. This will be applicable to one TIN (Taxpayer Identification Number)," said a ministry official.

The government is looking to reconvene Parliament's monsoon session to get the Constitutional amendment Bill on GST passed in the Rajya Sabha. Three Bills - on the Centre's GST (CGST), states' GST and Integrated GST -would come up after the Constitutional Bill is cleared. Work on the drafts is on.

States wanted a threshold of Rs 10 lakh to protect their revenue, while the Centre has assured them full compensation for five years. Besides, firms with an annual turnover between Rs 25 lakh and Rs 75 lakh will have an option to pay a flat rate of one per cent or GST rate. If they decide to opt for one per cent rate, firms will not get input credits because of which many, particularly dealers, may choose the GST rate.

The exemption limit from value added tax and service tax across states - except the North-East - is close to Rs 10 lakh turnover. "There will be an impact on revenue but it will depend on how many under the Rs 25 lakh to Rs 75 lakh annual turnover bracket opt for the one per cent rate. If 60-70 per cent opt for it, there will be loss of revenue for states but they will also get compensated by the Centre," said Bipin Sapra, tax partner, EY. From the manufacturing point of view, it was important to keep the exemption limit higher, he added.

While these are likely to be part of the GST laws, a final decision on this is to be taken by the yet-unformed GST Council. This is to be constituted within two months of enacting the Constitution amendment. It would comprise the Union and state finance ministers and will be empowered to take key decisions on GST.

The idea is that entities with a turnover of up to Rs 75 lakh will not attract any checks or audits from either the state or the Centre. The Centre will give states a free run on compliance checks for companies with annual turnover above Rs 75 lakh and up to Rs 1.5 crore. "Here, the Centre will only do online scrutiny. And, if states detect non-compliance with respect to CGST, only the Centre will issue a notice. States cannot issue a notice on our behalf," said an official. However, in case of companies with annual turnover of more than Rs 1.5 crore, there will be concurrent audits by both the state government and the Centre.

"The government is still discussing a mechanism of a risk-based selection so that the checks by Centre and states do not overlap," said the official.

The government on Sunday made a renewed appeal to Opposition parties to help pass the Constitutional amendment through an extended monsoon session. It is vital that this be cleared at the earliest for the government to stick to the GST implementation timeline of April 1, 2016. The three draft legislations will lay down the fine print of the uniform indirect tax regime.


- CA Kasliwal Ambar

Monday, 7 September 2015

RBI – New Guidelines on Concurrent Auditing at Branches




The ‪Reserve Bank‬ on Thursday said the concurrent audit at bank branches shouldcover at least half of their advances and deposits.

The concurrent audit system is regarded as part of a bank's early warning system to ensure timely detection of irregularities and lapses.


"Concurrent audit at branches should cover at least 50 per cent of the advances and 50 per cent of deposits of a bank," RBI said in a notification.

It said branches rated as high risk or above in the last risk-based internal audit (RBIA) or serious deficiencies found in internal audit are subject to concurrent audit.

The audit will also be applicable on all specialized branches like large corporate, mid corporate, exceptionally large/very large branches, SMEs and all centralised processing units like loan processing units (LPUs).

Besides, it would include service branches, centralized account opening divisions, wealth and portfolio management services, card products divisions, data centres and treasury/ foreign exchange business, investment banking, among others.

The concurrent audit also helps in preventing fraudulent transactions at branches.

The main role of concurrent audit is to supplement the efforts of the bank in carrying out simultaneous internal check of the transactions and other verifications and compliance with the procedures laid down, the RBI said.

The scope of concurrent audit should be wide enough or focused to cover certain fraud-prone areas such as handling of cash, deposits, advances, foreign exchange business, off-balance sheet items, credit-card business, Internet banking, it added.

The regulator said appointment of an external audit firm for concurrent audit may be initially for one year and extended up to three years, after which an auditor could be shifted to another branch, subject to satisfactory performance.

Saturday, 5 September 2015

Abolition of ISA Eligibility Test



The Committee decided to abolish the ISA Eligibility Test from the Post Qualification Course on Information Systems Audit and all the members who have not yet qualified the ISA Eligibility Test and completed the Professional Training classes will be allowed to appear directly in the forthcoming ISA Assessment Test scheduled to be held in December, 2015. All the participants who will complete their professional training classes by 20th November, 2015 will be allowed to appear directly in the ISA Assessment Test scheduled to be held in the month of December, 2015.

- CA Kasliwal Ambar

Saturday, 22 August 2015

Important Announcement for Final Course Students - November 2015 Examinations



Subject: Revised Reading Material on the Insurance Act, 1938 incorporating Insurance Laws (Amendment) Act, 2015 - Relevant for the Final Examination to be held in November 2015.
Students are quite aware that for the purpose of Examination a cut off period of six months would be applicable in case of any legislative amendment(s) in the relevant subject(s) for the purpose of applicability to the relevant examination. In this connection, we wish to inform to inform you that the Insurance Laws (Amendment) Act, 2015 an act further to amend the Insurance Act, 1938 will be applicable for the November, 2015 examination. This Amendment Act is deemed to have come into force on 26th December, 2014 though it was passed by the Lok Sabha on 4th March, 2015, by the Rajya Sabha on 12th March, 2015 and receiving the assent of the President on 20thMarch, 2015.The Amendment Act, 2015 paved the way for major reforms in the Insurance Act, 1938, the General Insurance Business (Nationalization) Act, 1972 and the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) Act, 1999.

Keeping in view of the applicability for the November, 2015 (Final Examinations), the Board of Studies has revised the existing reading material in the relevant Chapter 23 of Module 2 of Paper 4 (Corporate and Allied Laws) for the Final Course. Students appearing for the November, 2015 Final examinations may kindly download the said revised reading material from the BOS (Knowledge Portal) straightway without waiting for the publication of the revised reading material which is likely to be published only in January, 2016. This will enable them to facilitate reading and understanding of the latest amendments in the existing Insurance Act, 1938 keeping in view the forthcoming November, 2015 Final Examination. Accordingly, the existing material on the Insurance Act, 1938 in the study Module No. 2 stands withdrawn and revised material on this Chapter would be applicable for the November, 2015 examination.

Rtp for Nov'15 attempt is hosted in institute website.

-CA Kasliwal Ambar

Interesting Audit Update



In Bank Audit we study that NPA is biggest problem of banking system. To get rid of NPAs we have SARFESIA, Sale of NPAs, Corporate Debt Restructuring.

Now RBI has come up with BAZOOKA of all

"Strategic Debt Restructuring Norms", it is going to blow away defaulters.

As per RBI banks can convert there loan into equity shares upto 51% take control from promoters appoint temporary management, sell shares to new management and recover there money. 

Within few weeks it has started happening and now Lenders of Lanco-Teesta power of 3500 crores plant will be converting loan into 51% equity shares " It made ET headlines few days back "

Budding CAs should be aware of these big changes in banking and finance sector.

m.economictimes.com/industry/banking/finance/lanco-lenders-to-acquire-teesta-hydro-power-through-debt-equity-conversion/articleshow/48417058.cms

- CA Kasliwal Ambar

Rule-21A, Income-tax Rules




Rule-21A, Income-tax Rules

30[Relief when salary is paid in arrears or in advance, etc.

21A. 31[(1) Where, by reason of any portion of an assessee's salary being paid in arrears or in advance or, by reason of any portion of family pension received by an assessee being paid in arrears or, by reason of his having received in any one financial year salary for more than twelve months or a payment which under the provisions of clause (3) of section 17 is a profit in lieu of salary, his income is assessed at a rate higher than that at which it would otherwise have been assessed, the relief to be granted under sub-section (1) of section 89 shall be—

(a) where any portion of the assessee's salary is received in arrears or in advance or, any portion of family pension is received by an assessee in arrears, in accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (2);(b) where the payment is in the nature of gratuity in respect of past services of the assessee extending over a period of not less than five years, in accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (3);(c) where the payment is in the nature of compensation received by the assessee from his employer or former employer at or in connection with the termination of his employment after continuous service for not less than three years and where the unexpired portion of his term of employment is also not less than three years, in accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (4);(d) where the payment is in commutation of pension, in accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (5); and(e) where the payment is not in the nature of salary paid in arrears or in advance or gratuity in respect of past services or compensation received at or in connection with the termination of employment or in commutation of pension, in accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (6).

(2)(a) In a case referred to in clause (a) of sub-rule (1), the tax payable by the assessee on his total income of the previous year in which the salary is received in arrears or in advance or, in which the family pension is received in arrears (such salary or family pension being hereafter in this sub-rule referred to respectively as the additional salary or additional family pension, as the case may be, and such previous year being hereafter in this sub-rule referred to as the relevant previous year) shall be reduced by theamount, if any, by which the tax on the additional salary or additional family pension, calculated in the manner specified in clause (b), exceeds the tax or the aggregate tax on the additional salary or additional family pension, calculated in the manner specified in clause (c) or clause (d), as the case may be.

(b) Tax shall be calculated on the total income of the relevant previous year as reduced by the additional salary or additional family pension, as the case may be, as if the total income so reduced were the total income of the assessee, and the amount by which the tax so calculated falls short of the tax on the total income before such reduction shall, for the purposes of clause (a), be taken to be the tax on the additional salary or additional family pension, under this clause.

(c) Where the additional salary or additional family pension, as the case may be, relates to only one previous year, tax shall be calculated on the total income of the said previous year as increased by the additional salary or additional family pension, as if the total income so increased were the total income of the assessee, and the amountby which the tax so calculated exceeds the tax payable by the assessee in respect of the total income of the said previous year shall, for the purposes of clause (a), be taken to be the tax on the additional salary or additional family pension, under this clause.

(d) Where the additional salary or additional family pension, as the case may be, relates to more than one previous year,—

(i) the previous years to which the additional salary or additional family pension relates and the amount relating to each such previous year shall first be ascertained;(ii) tax shall, then, be calculated on the total income of each such previous year as increased by the amount relating to such previous year ascertained under sub-clause (i); as if the total income so increased were the total income of that previous year, and the amount by which the aggregate amount of tax in respect of the aforesaid previous years as calculated under sub-clause (ii) exceeds the aggregate amount of tax payable by the assessee in respect of the total income of the said previous years shall, for the purposes of clause (a), be taken to be the aggregate tax on the additional salary or additional family pension, under this clause.]

(3) (a) In a case referred to in clause (b) of sub-rule (1), the tax payable by the assessee on his total income of the previous year in which the payment by way of gratuity is received (such previous year being hereafter in this sub-rule referred to as the relevant previous year) shall be reduced by theamount, if any, by which the tax on theamount of the gratuity included in the total income of the relevant previous year, calculated at the average rate of tax applicable to such total income, exceeds the tax on the amount of such gratuity, calculated at the rate of tax determined under clause (b) or, as the case may be, clause (c).

(b) Where the payment by way of gratuity is made in respect of past services of the assessee extending over a period of not less than five years but less than fifteen years,—

(i) the total income of the assessee in respect of each of the two previous years immediately preceding the relevant previous year shall be increased by an amount equal to one-half of the amount of the gratuity included in the total income of the relevant previous year, and the average rate of tax for each of the said two previous years shall be calculated as if the total income so increased were the total income of that previous year; and(ii) the average of the average rates of tax for the two previous years immediately preceding the relevant previous year, calculated in accordance with sub-clause (i), shall, for the purposes of clause (a), be the rate of tax determined under this clause.

(c) Where the payment by way of gratuity is made in respect of past services of the assessee extending over a period of not less than fifteen years,—

(i) the total income of the assessee in respect of each of the three previous years immediately preceding the relevant previous year shall be increased by an amount equal to one-third of the amount of the gratuity included in the total income of the relevant previous year, and the average rate of tax for each of the said three previous years shall be calculated as if the total income so increased were the total income of that previous year; and(ii) the average of the average rates of tax for the three previous years immediately preceding the relevant previous year, calculated in accordance with sub-clause (i), shall, for the purposes of clause (a), be the rate of tax determined under this clause.

(4) (a) In a case referred to in clause (c) of sub-rule (1), the tax payable by the assessee on his total income of the previous year in which the payment by way of compensation is received (such previous year being hereafter in this sub-rule referred to as the relevant previous year) shall be reduced by theamount, if any, by which the tax on theamount of the compensation included in the total income of the relevant previous year, calculated at the average rate of tax applicable to such total income, exceeds the tax on the amountof such compensation, calculated at the rate of tax determined under clause (b).

(b) The total income of the assessee in respect of each of the three previous years immediately preceding the relevant previous year shall be increased by an amount equal to one-third of the amount.

- CA Kasliwal Ambar

SEBI imposed a penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs on the Director of Manappuram Finance Limited for breach of SEBI Regulations.


SEBI vide its order dated August 19, 2015 imposed a penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs on the Director of Manappuram Finance Limited for breach of SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations. The brief facts of the case are as follows :

1. The wife of the Directors sold shares of the Company without seeking pre-clearance from the Compliance Officer.

2. The Director submitted that (i) his wife was financially independent (ii) trading without pre-clearance was only a technically slip that would not warrant any penalty - an opinion from Amarchand Mangaldas was also submitted to support these views. (iii) he had discussed at the board meeting of the Company about the intention of his wife to sell the shares of the Company.

3. SEBI observed and ruled that (i) financial independence is immaterial in case of spouse (ii) trading without pre-clearance is a violation of regulation and hence penalty would follow (iii) the discussion of the wife proposed trade at the board meeting is not substantiated with agenda or minutes of the meeting and (iv) penalized the Director for violation of Regulations and Internal code of conduct.

Key Take-away – Personal Transaction Policy and SEBI Insider Trading norms need to be followed in letter and spirit. SEBI does not take into account any technicalities or intention of the parties. You may note that the Director in this case was about 90 years old retired civil servant without any blemish but still had been penalized for the unintentional error.

Thursday, 20 August 2015

IMPORTANT NEWS & UPDATES FOR CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS - 20th Aug 2015


➡ IMPORTANTS NEWS

1. Govt. notifies 'Challan No. ITNS 284' for depositing taxes under Black Money Act.
2. RBI grants approvals for 11 payment banks including Reliance, Airtel, Vodafone

➡ INCOME TAX

1. Compounding fee paid to Municipal Corporation is in nature of penalty disallowable.

2. 60 taxmann.com 287 (Chennai - Trib.) ITAT allows sec. 11 tax exemption to Tamil Nadu Cricket Association.

3. High Court has inherent power to review its own judgment, says Supreme Court.

4. 60 taxmann.com 135 (Bombay) No concealment penalty if sum treated as capital receipt was disclosed in notes to accounts and return.

➡ BANKING AND CORPORATES LAWS
1. 60 taxmann.com 285 (SAT - Mumbai) Where in guise of running real estate business, PACL was running sham Collective Investment Schemes (CIS) which were detrimental to interest of investors, decision of SEBI directing PACL to wind up existing CIS and refund money collected from investors with promised return could not faulted.

➡ CST AND VAT LAWS
1. 60 taxmann.com 123 (Gujarat) Gujarat VAT - Where Assessing Authority cancelled registration certificates of assessee on ground that alleged purchases made by it from two dealers were bogus and not genuine and even assessee had indulged into billing activities only, registration certificates had been rightly cancelled.

➡ SERVICE TAX AND EXCISE LAWS.
1. 60 taxmann.com 122 (SC): Wharfage charges and lease rent recovered by port authorities cannot be regarded as 'service' in relation to 'a vessel or goods' and cannot be said to be a service provided by 'port or person authorised by it'; hence, same is not liable to service tax under port services.

2. Excise :No personal penalty on directors where issue relates to interpretation of law and situation is revenue neutral.

- CA Kasliwal Ambar

PROFESSIONAL UPDATES & CA NEWS by CA Kasliwal Ambar- 20th August 2015

# IT: Interest u/s 234B - no direction had actually been given in the assessment order for payment of interest - Form I.T.N.S.150 contained a calculation of interest payable on the tax assessed - this Form must be treated as part of the assessment order in the wider sense - levy of interest confirmed (Supreme Court)

# ST: Franchise service - Nature of Receipt of course fees - Only because all the fees are provided in one Agreement does not necessarily lead to a conclusion that the different components of fees are only for the purpose of grant of franchise (CESTAT Mumbai)

# IT: Finance ministry mulls 1% Income Tax rebate for credit/debit card payments.

# IT: CBDT amends IT Rules to notify that computation of Period of Stay in India of an Indian Citizen being Member of Crew of a Ship shall be as per Voyage Discharge Certificate (VDC).

# IT: CBDT to clarify on the period for which foreign bank account details disclosures required under black money law through second set of FAQs on the black money.

# GST: Government pushing ahead with GST; Two verticals created for implementation.

# Vacancies: HDFC bank needs Credit Manager in Punjab, Haryana & Rajasthan. Contact: Mr. Raghav Mahajan (+917307211397) / Email: raghav.mahajan1@hdfcbank.com

- CA Kasliwal Ambar