Wednesday, 30 September 2015

Bom HC passed interim order considering ‪‎Gujarat‬ and P&H HC judgement:

Directed ‪CBDT‬ to issue extending date for e-filing of ‪ROI‬ by 31.10.15. Court has not examined any other aspect.This order will not affect any other obligation to be fulfilled under Act.

-CA Kasliwal Ambar


CBDT‬ directed by Bom. HC to issue extending date for e-filing


Tuesday, 29 September 2015

Betting turnover in Bihar elections is expected to cross Rs 10,000 crore

Bookies in the satta bazzar or the illegal betting market, who accurately predicted a single party majority for BJP in May 2014's national polls, are predicting that state's two political parties the RDJ and JDU may not win more than 50 seats and 80 seats respectively in the 243 seat state assembly. It is the best case scenario of both these political parties, bookies. Odds on Nitish Kumar led JDU winning 80 seats are pegged at 6:1 while Lalu Yadav's RJD winning 50 seats is pegged at 6:1.

"Anti-incumbency is strongly against JDU, while people of Bihar have still not forgotten the poor state of law during RJD's tenure," said a bookie. Betting turnover in Bihar elections is expected to cross Rs 10,000 crore.

The BJP appears to be galloping ahead in Bihar polls like the bulls. Bookies say in the worst case the BJP's seat count may not fall below 85 seats whereas there is no cap on seats on the upside. Bookies will offer only 85 paise on every rupee bet for BJP winning 85 seats. 

Lower the odds, higher are the chances of a win.

A couple of months ago most bets were on a close contest. The bookies gave BJP lead NDA and Nitish Kumar around 110 each. But, the punters now favour a clear majority for the NDA, giving it around 135 seats, JDU 40-42, RJD 33-35 and relegating Congress to single digits.

- CA Kasliwal Ambar

Saturday, 26 September 2015

AUDITORS SHOULD NOT AFFIX THEIR DIGITAL SIGNATURE IN ROC RETURNS




Forms for annual filing have been released today. The two forms ie Form 23AC and ACA have been replaced by a single Form AOC-4.


Now every company needs to file its balance sheet in Form AOC-4

Form AOC -4 is required to be certified by any CA CS or ICWA in practice by subscribing to the declaration that the respective professional has been duly engaged for certification of the said form.

As per the provisions of section 144 of the Companies Act 2013 certain services can't be rendered as an auditor, which includes “management services”

Management services means services rendered on behalf of Management, which management itself is oblige to do.
E.g.

Preparation and filling of:
· Income Tax Return
· ROC Return
· Service Tax Return
· VAT Return
· TDS Return
· Excise Return

This can be planned to comply with the provision.

- CA Kasliwal Ambar

Friday, 25 September 2015

CASA Daily News Alert

>> TAR/ITR Extension Case:

Writ Petition filed against non extension of Due date of TAR/ITR filing for cases covered under Tax Audit Provisions in various High Courts (Gujarat, Delhi, Jodhpur, Karnataka, Orrisa, Mumbai and in Punjab & Haryana) - Cases adjourned for Hearing / Cases Listed for Final Hearing later. ICAI Meeting with FM: No Concrete Decision on TAR/ITR Date Extension.

>> CBDT has updated the tax audit utility today by updating utilities for form 3CA CD, form 3CB CD and form 10B. So please take care and in case you are using tax filling software ask your vendor to update software.

>> ICAI: Exposure Draft of Changes in Ind ASs as a consequence of deferment of Ind AS 115, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, for Public Comments issued

>> MCA Updates: New forms (AOC-4, MGT-7, ADT-2, SH-9) will be available from 25-09-2015. Versions of CRA-4 & CHG-4 are likely to be modified w.e.f. 25-09-2015.

>> SEBI has issued circular under Regulation 27(2) of the SEBI(Listing obligations and disclosure requirements) Regulations, 2015 read with regulation 101(2) (Clause 49 of the existing listing agreement), which provides for the format for compliance report on corporate governance to be submitted to the Stock exchanges by the listed entities.

>> Case Study: Bombay High Court held In the case of M/s Nagpur Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT. that in order to attract ceiling u/s 40(c), the payment must be a periodical payment. A Lumsum payment or one time payment is not covered under section 40(c) of Income Tax Act

- CA Kasliwal Ambar


Thursday, 24 September 2015

Delhi High Court rejected writ for extention of due date for TAR

Delhi High Court rejected writ for extension of due date for TAR; said CAs should have completed audit by 7th July( i.e. date till form notified), time thereafter is sufficient to file TAR (7th July to 30th September) 

Facts:
a) The petitioner claims to be entitled to extension of due date of filing income-tax return (‘ITR’) (i.e., September 30, 2015) due to the delay on the part of the respondents in prescribing the ITR forms. b) It was contended that the said forms were prescribed only vide Notification dated 29th July, 2015 and were made available only with effect from August 7, 2015. The argument of the counsel for the petitioner was that since the Assessment Year 2015-2016 commenced on 1st April, 2015 and the due date for filing the return is 30th September, 2015, so 180 days are to be made available to the assessee to file the return. The Delhi High Court held as under:

1) The period claimed by the petitioner as a matter of right of 180 days for filing the ITR is admittedly not prescribed, neither in the Statute nor in the Rules.

2) Filing of ITR for assesses due date whereof is 180 day sis dependent upon the accounts of the assessee being audited and which audit the counsel for the petitioner admits commences only on the beginning of assessment year. The said audit, in the case of some assesses may be completed in a few days and in case of others may take longer. Thus, the time taken in audit, which is variable, will be determinative of the time available thereafter for filing the ITR. Said audit is not dependent upon the prescription of the income-tax return (‘ITR’)forms.

3) Once the audit is complete the time admittedly available from 29th July, 2015 / 7th August, 2015 to 30th September, 2015 cannot be said to be so small.

4) The Government vide Press Release dated 9th September, 2015 have already clarified that the date of 30th September, 2015 will not be extended and have advised the taxpayers to file the returns accordingly. The time available, after 7th August, 2015 and till 30th September, 2015 is not found to be illogical or unreasonable to enable the assessees to file the ITR.

5) The counsel for CBDT is unable to give the reasons for the forms are not available at the beginning of the assessment year on 1st April of every year and the same thereby causing inconvenience to the practitioners of the subject.

6) There is sufficient time available to the Government, after the Finance Act of the financial year, to finalise the forms and if no change is intended therein, to notify of the same immediately.

7) From the next assessment year Government should at least ensure that the forms which are to be prescribed for their Audit Report and for filing the ITR are available as on 1st April of the assessment year unless there is a valid reason therefore and which should be recorded in writing by the respondents themselves, without waiting for any representations to be made.

-CA Kasliwal Ambar

Saturday, 19 September 2015

Cash loan of above Rs. 20,000 taken by builder to meet immediate requirement of business won’t attract penalty












Section 269SS, read with sections 273B and 271D, of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Deposits - Mode of taking/accepting


Penalty under section 271D could not be levied when assessee sufficiently process that loan was taken in excess of Rs. 20,000 to meet urgent and immediate requirement of Business

[2015] 56 taxmann.com 439 -HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT –CIT v. Shreenathji Corpn

Assessee carries on business of construction of building and in course of such business large amount of labour charges and payments for raw material purchased from unorganized trading sectors and bricks etc. are required to be made after banking hours

If their demand for cash payment was not met they would cancel contract work and refused to complete work and would also prevent other contractors from undertaking work till their dues were settled

It was held that since loan/deposits was taken in excess of Rs. 20,000 to meet urgent and immediate requirements of business, no penalty could be imposed

Circulars and Notifications: Circular Nos. 387 dated 6-7-1984 and 572, dated 3-8-1990


- CA Kasliwal Ambar

Thursday, 17 September 2015

Chartered Accountant: Latest Updates You Need To Know - 17th September 2015


1. President ICAI suggested Finance Minister to extend due date of filing of ITR & Tax Audit Report be extended from 30.9.2015 to atleast 31.10.2015 for genuine hardship to the assesses and members of the profession.

2. Individuals can now apply for PAN online with digital signature w.e.f 6.9.2015.

3. Salary and Interest to partner to be allowed as deduction while estimating the profits of the firm where books of accounts are rejected- Inter Continental Constructions (High Court of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana).

4. If the notice u/s 148 of I T Act was not served on the assessee in accordance with law, the re-assessment made is liable to be quashed.[ CIT vs. Chetan Gupta, High Court of Delhi]

5. Now a private company can accept unsecured loans also from a relative of director, with a declaration that such loan is not from borrowings. Notification dated 15.09.2015.

6. Union Cabinet has approved to promulgate the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Ordinance 2015 which redefined the jurisdiction clause in the Negotiable Instrument Act.

7. DGFT has notified modification in E-IEC’s as well as the IEC’s issued in physical format from 21st of September, 2015. www.dgft.nic.in.

- CA Kasliwal Ambar